A coalition of conservation and animal-protection groups,
including The Humane Society of the United States, has filed a
lawsuit against two U.S. agencies to halt the implementation of
a new federal regulation that removes much of the protections
for the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
The HSUS joined 16 other organizations in filing the suit on
October 1 in U.S. District Court in Oregon against the U.S.
Department of the Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS). The new federal regulation in question, which
downlists gray wolves under the ESA, went into effect on April
1.
The groups are attempting to block the April 1 rule issued by the
USFWS, which downlists most gray wolves in the lower 48 states
from endangered to threatened. The threatened
classification—along with additional special rules issued by
the USFWS—makes it easier for people to resort to lethal
methods in resolving conflicts between humans and wolves
throughout the Great Lakes states and the northern Rockies, as
well as in any neighboring states where the wolves may attempt
to disperse. What's more, the final rule also removes federal
wolf protections entirely in some states that are within
historical gray wolf range, but have not committed in any way
to wolf recovery.
Given the general lack of tolerance for these ecologically
important native carnivores, the new regulation could be
disastrous for gray wolves.
"Downlisting the gray wolf to threatened is premature,"
stated Dr. John W. Grandy, senior vice president of wildlife
programs at The HSUS. "Habitat loss, over-exploitation through
sport hunting and trapping, and a long history of
government-subsidized lethal control imperiled the wolf. The
same threats exist today, and it is clear that the states will
use any reduction in federal protection to resume the same
lethal activities that once jeopardized the very existence of
the gray wolf."
Gray wolves once ranged across the United States in the
hundreds of thousands. Although wolf scientists and
conservationists have been vocal in their belief that the
recovery of the gray wolf is still fragile and tenuous, the
federal government apparently believes the current population
estimate of 3,700 is large enough to merit a reduction of
federal protections, despite the fact that wolves still face
many threats to
their long-term survival.
The USFWS has announced that it is already making plans to
remove ESA protections entirely for gray wolves in two major
geographical areas. If the USFWS proceeds with its "delisting"
plans, which it has said could be implemented within the next
year, most wolves will be bereft of federal protections. The
species' survival will then be in the hands of individual
states—the same states that have shown these animals little
mercy so far.
Parties to the suit are Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club,
American Lands Alliance, Animal Protection Institute, Center
for Biological Diversity, Forest Watch, Hell's Canyon
Preservation Council, Help Our Wolves Live, The HSUS, Klamath
Forest Alliance, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Public
Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Minnesota Wolf
Alliance, Oregon Natural Resources Council, RESTORE: The North
Woods, Sinapu, and the Wildlands Project.