The state of whale protection around the world is at a critical
juncture. Yes, the International Whaling Commission's 1986 ban
on commercial whaling is still in effect, but countries like
Japan, Norway and, most recently, Iceland not only continue to
threaten the law's effectiveness by exploiting the "scientific
whaling" and other loopholes, but also threaten to overturn the
ban by recruiting like-minded allies to the IWC.
Given that these countries continue to kill whales—and
promise more damage in the future—the World Society for the
Protection of Animals (WSPA) has created a new campaign
initiative called "Whalewatch." More than 140 non-governmental
organizations representing more than 55 countries have joined
the campaign, whose goal is simple: to highlight the fact that
all methods of whaling are inhumane, and cause whales to
suffer—sometimes for a prolonged period of time. The HSUS is
one of the leading NGOs steering the campaign.
"Simply put, there is no humane way to slaughter such a
large animal who is constantly in motion," says Kitty Block,
special counsel to The HSUS's United Nations, Treaties and
International Trade section. "Whaling methods don't come close
to meeting the standards for humane slaughter."
To present its arguments more forcefully, the coalition has
produced a 144-page report titled, Troubled Waters: A Review
of the Welfare Implications of Modern Whaling Activities,
which was written by many of the acknowledged experts in the
study of marine mammals. Two HSUS staff members, Kitty Block
and Dr. Naomi Rose, contributed to the report, which can be
found on the coalition's
web site. Sir David Attenborough, the esteemed British
natural history journalist, has written a forward to the
report.
The report touches upon the many issues surrounding whaling
(which already accounts for more than 1,400 deaths annually):
killing methods, welfare implications, criteria for assessing
time of death, stress impacts, sea and weather conditions, and
legal and ethical considerations.
An excerpt from the report: "The combination of visibility,
sea state, ship motion, and marksmanship are likely to impact
significantly on the ability of a whaler to reliably kill a
whale instantaneously. If weather, sea conditions or the motion
of the vessel do not allow for a properly aimed shot, then
there is a significant risk of a poorly placed harpoon or
bullet causing an extended time of death and associated
suffering."
The HSUS Connection
For Troubled Waters, The HSUS's Kitty Block
contributed to a comparative analysis between slaughterhouse
standards and whaling methods—an essay which argues for, among
other things, a legal requirement for the humane slaughter of
whales similar to those for other food animals, such as
livestock. Block also provided a background study on the legal
precedents for whale protection, which appears in Chapters 12
and 14 of the report.
In her role with The HSUS, Block oversees efforts in
international treaties and agreements, including the
International Whaling Commission. Block provides legal analysis
and drafts position papers on domestic and international laws
involving animals. She also actively lobbies member countries
to the relevant agreements as well as drafts proscriptive
language (resolutions, convention amendments, etc.), presents
policy papers, and serves on oversight panels.
HSUS's marine mammal scientist Naomi Rose (credited as N.A.
Rose in the report) provided information on the biology and
culture of whale species, which has been incorporated into
Chapter 4, "Whales—individuals, societies and cultures."
Rose oversees all marine mammal issues and programs at The
HSUS, including protection of marine mammals in the wild and in
captive situations. Rose is The HSUS scientific representative
to the IWC.
Since the early 1970s, The HSUS has attended meetings of the
IWC, the body created to regulate whaling. The IWC has evolved
over the years, gradually shifting its focus from whaling to
the conservation and protection of whales, starting with the
commission's 1986 ban on commercial whaling. However,
pro-whaling countries have continued to kill whales under the
guise of scientific research or via objecting to the
moratorium, and they are coming dangerously close to having
enough votes on their side to overturn the ban on whaling.
The HSUS and the Whalewatch coalition lobbies IWC member
countries to maintain the ban on commercial whaling and to
strengthen the commission's focus on whale conservation,
welfare, and the cruelty involved in whaling methods. The HSUS
urges the United States government to maintain its strong
support of the moratorium and to impose sanctions on those
countries that undermine the IWC by killing whales.